Tags
Cynism, Facebook, Factophobia, Humor, Individualism, Religion, Sarcasm, Satire, Science, Selfie, Social media
–
You humans seem to be interested in two things:
As the year is drawing to a close, it’s time to determine 2013’s ‘Word of the Year’. However, you humans can’t agree on what word to pick.
The people behind Oxford Dictionary favour – yes, they favor with a ‘u’ – ‘Selfie’. The people of Merriam-Webster think ‘Science’ should win the trophy.
For those of you unfamiliar with words, a Selfie is a meaningless picture of oneself generally posted on a social media outlet. Science is that thing that has religion playing catch up for the last 500 years or so.
Merriam-Webster found ‘Science’ had the biggest and most substantial increase in last year’s Google searches. Oxford probably reached their conclusion the moment they joined Facebook.
Sadly, I’m inclined to agree with Oxford. ‘Science’ could have been Word of the Year 1633, when Galileo Galilei faced off with the church pretending to be Sean Hannity.
It’s nice to know people are showing a bigger interest in science. But in my humble opinion most humans would rather snap a selfie than learn about cold fusion.
And let’s be honest: who doesn’t snap a selfie every now and then? That picture of A. van Nerel in About the authors and this site? That’s a selfie. That’s A. van Nerel trying to look smart. He even made it black and white to look smarter. But make no mistake about it: it was he himself who had pushed a button ten seconds before that pic was taken. And it was probably his fourth or fifth attempt, as he’s not good at looking smart. Also, it’s difficult to let one’s smartphone stand upright.
My favorite selfies are the ones you find on dating sites. Nowhere do smartphones fuel vanity as much as in this corner of the internet. Nothing’s more amusing than to see a human being try to look sexy while holding a device originally intended for making calls.
Just so we’re clear: I wish it upon every human being to feel as sexy as Tom Jones’ underwear.
But most selfies suggest people think sexy and needy are one and the same.
Because that’s what a selfie is, isn’t it? It’s a need for attention and validation. I wonder what made humans feel validated in the previous millennium. It seems so long ago.
Personally, I feel it’s a bit sad the word ‘selfie’ has become such an integral part of your existence. If only Merriam-Webster was right: I can’t help but feel the world could be better off if science was a common activity rather than a common search term.
But perhaps you need to overcome yourselves first. Perhaps selfies are caused by factophobia. Perhaps people fear the world’s ever growing complexity and look inward for comfort. Basically, that’s exactly what science would tell you not to do.
But science could still beat selfies. In 2015! Just make sure ‘factophobia’ becomes ‘Word of the Year 2014’. If people can accept their factophobia, they could overcome it. Then they could embrace science at the expense of selfies.
Makes perfect sense, right?
In aid of promoting the word ‘factophobia’, I present you with a short list of famous factophobes. Spread the word!
I could go on, but my guess is you get the message. In the name of science, make ‘factophobia’ Word of the Year 2014!
–
inspiredbythedivine1 said:
I’ve a selfie of me boiling a Christian infant alive in oil I was going to publish, but decided against it as it may give the authorities a key to my whereabouts.
Lester Beaver said:
Well, I’m actually on former South African president Mbeki on this one: no drug in the world could stop that video from going viral;)
belle.beckford said:
Lester Beaver, you scared me again with the pic of Factophobe # 3. (In fact, scared me twice, because I had to go back to see what number it was!) I thought you weren’t going to do that again…
mikesteeden said:
Until I read it in the papers just the other day I had never heard the word ‘selfie’ so I thought, now you have eloquently described what they are, I might try one. My son then reminded me that I don’t have a mobile so that put pay to that! A fine collection of facts by the way – a fine post and a good read!
Lester Beaver said:
Sorry, so sorry! I completely forgot you and I had that arrangement…it’s just that when I tried to think of famous factophobes, she was the first that came to mind. I purposely didn’t put her first, because I figured it would be too obvious, and I figured Bachmann and the pope might ease people into it…Once again, I am truly sorry….it’s just that: it’s kinda hard writing satire if you’re not allowed to mention Ann Coulter. It’s kinda like writing about World War II and not mentioning Hitler:S
belle.beckford said:
OK. All is forgiven. 🙂
Lester Beaver said:
You. Are. My. Hero. (I put periods in between each word otherwise you might think I’m just being nice, while the fact is you really Are. My. Hero.) Why? Because you don’t have a cell phone. Your life must be an oasis of bliss in these cellular times (for lack of a better adjective).
To be honest, I hadn’t heard of the word selfie before yesterday either. But when I read about it, I couldn’t help but agree with Oxford: it’s a word that captures our time as much as ‘potatoe’ did in 1565, when the first potatoes arrived in Europe.
Lester Beaver said:
Phew…if only Ann Coulter were as open minded as you!
Kimberly M. Ringer said:
I don’t mind selfies in general. What I do mind is when people take selfies of themselves pretending to be a duck! Mr. Beaver, why would people want to be a duck?
I shall abide by your request and help make factophobia the word of 2015. Ok internets…. You heard Mr. Beaver. MAKE IT SO!
mikesteeden said:
I did have one once but never found the occasion to use it – I couldn’t get my head around texting in part or at all. Shirley uses one about twice a year when travelling West to see relatives and that’s about it. In fact I lie – before we sold the business (we were PI’s) I did take incoming calls on one whilst in France. Anyway, thanks for replying. Have you tried the Anya variety of potato? They, I am told, are quite authentic in terms of being similar to the originals and make a brilliant Sag Aloo!
Lester Beaver said:
You were PI’s? Now that’s interesting! At least I assume it’s interesting. With the clear benefit of hindsight, I must say your blogs do have a certain PI-feel to it, a kind of underlying tone of inquistiveness (or is it inquisitivity, or inquisitivicity…never mind).
Being a beaver refusing to break character, I can’t say I’ver ever tasted any potatoes, but I’ll try anything that’s named ‘Sag Aloo!’
Lester Beaver said:
A duck? Really? Making selfies of oneself as a duck is a thing? Shame I didn’t know that, otherwise I would’ve definitely worked that into my post.
Thank you for helping out. Factophobes, beware!
Kimberly M. Ringer said:
Yes it is a thing!!!! Can you believe it? They call it “duck face”. Yea I know so original. /sigh
I warn you though, if you do a search on it, you may be having nightmares for awhile.
mikesteeden said:
Sometimes interesting mostly not – we used to trace financial fraudsters and such like. Never did get to trace any animals other than a stolen racehorse once!
As to Sag Aloo it is an Indian dish – a fine mix of potato and spinach! I am guessing beaver’s more likely go for tandoori branch with a lightly spiced bark salad side dish?
Lester Beaver said:
Well, I’m a beaver that blogs…so basically you can assume I’ll try anything;)
Regarding your PI history…I still imagine it to be more exciting than your average office job, even though you probably did not spend your day chasing bad guys in high speed chases (you and your wife are not Dempsey and Makepeace, right?)
Lester Beaver said:
Oh my god, Kimberly! I might even do a post on duck faces if I can find the courage.
Honestly, I kinda like you humans, especially the ones that read my blog, but why are there people that do this to themselves? Why!?
Thanks for inspiring me, though…not sure if it’ll be an entire post or a part of it, but I simply cannot not write something about duck faces now that I’ve seen them…